Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Oncol ; : JCO2302182, 2024 Mar 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452327

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved talazoparib with enzalutamide for first-line treatment of patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The approval was based on the HRR gene-mutated (HRRm) population of TALAPRO-2, a randomized, double-blind trial that randomly assigned 1,035 patients with mCRPC to receive enzalutamide with either talazoparib or placebo. Two cohorts enrolled sequentially: an all-comer population (Cohort 1), followed by an HRRm-only population (Cohort 2). The independent primary end points were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per blinded independent central review (BICR) in Cohort 1 (all-comers) and in the combined HRRm population (all HRRm patients from Cohorts 1 and 2). Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary end point. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement in rPFS by BICR was demonstrated in both the all-comers cohort and the combined HRRm population, with hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.78; P < .0001) and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.61; P < .0001), respectively. In an exploratory analysis of the 155 patients with BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) mCRPC, rPFS HR was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.36). In the non-HRRm/unknown stratum of Cohort 1 (n = 636), the rPFS HR was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.89). OS was immature. CONCLUSION: Despite a statistically significant rPFS improvement in the all-comer cohort, FDA did not consider the magnitude of rPFS clinically meaningful in the context of the broad indication, combination treatment, and safety profile. Approval was therefore limited to patients with HRRm mCRPC, for whom there was a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in rPFS and favorable OS results. This represents the first approval for the first-line treatment of patients with HRRm mCRPC.

2.
J Clin Oncol ; 42(5): 605-613, 2024 Feb 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127780

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This article summarizes the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of the data leading to approval of olaparib plus abiraterone for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), as determined by an FDA-approved companion diagnostic test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Approval was based on the results from PROpel, a double-blind trial that randomly assigned 796 patients with mCRPC to abiraterone plus prednisone or prednisolone with either olaparib or placebo. The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per investigator assessment. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in rPFS for olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone, with a median rPFS of 25 versus 17 months and a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.81) in the intention-to-treat population. In an exploratory analysis of the subgroup of 85 patients with BRCAm mCRPC, the HR for rPFS was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.45) and the HR for overall survival (OS) was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.59). In an exploratory analysis of the subgroup of 711 patients without an identified BRCA mutation, the HR for rPFS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96) and the HR for OS was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.14). Adding olaparib to abiraterone resulted in increased toxicity, including anemia requiring transfusion in 18% of patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with mCRPC, efficacy of the combination of olaparib plus abiraterone was primarily attributed to the treatment effect in the BRCAm subgroup, the indicated population for the approval. For patients without BRCAm, the FDA determined that the modest rPFS improvement, combined with clinically significant toxicities, did not demonstrate a favorable risk/benefit assessment.


Assuntos
Androstenos , Ftalazinas , Piperazinas , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/genética , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapêutico , United States Food and Drug Administration , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Prednisona , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 27(16): 4478-4485, 2021 08 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33753456

RESUMO

On December 20, 2019, the FDA granted accelerated approval to fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki [DS-8201a; T-DXd; tradename ENHERTU (Daiichi Sankyo)] for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who have received two or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. Approval was based on data from study DS8201-A-U201 (DESTINY-Breast01) with supportive safety data from study DS8201-A-J101. The primary efficacy endpoint in DESTINY-Breast01 was overall response rate (ORR) based on confirmed responses by blinded independent central review (ICR) using RECIST v1.1 in all participants who were assigned to receive the recommended dose of 5.4 mg/kg while secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR). The confirmed ORR based on ICR in these 184 patients was 60.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 52.9-67.4] and the median DoR was 14.8 months (95% CI: 13.8-16.9). Interstitial lung disease, including pneumonitis, was experienced in patients treated with T-DXd and can be severe, life threatening, or fatal. In addition, neutropenia and left ventricular dysfunction were included as Warnings and Precautions in labeling. Other important common adverse reactions were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, alopecia, constipation, decreased appetite, anemia, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia. Overall, the totality of efficacy and safety data supported the accelerated approval of T-DXd for the intended indication.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Aprovação de Drogas , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Trastuzumab/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Camptotecina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Estados Unidos
4.
Clin Cancer Res ; 27(8): 2126-2129, 2021 04 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33188141

RESUMO

On June 29, 2020, the FDA approved pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and hyaluronidase-zzxf subcutaneous injection (Phesgo) for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. Patients should be selected for therapy based on an FDA-approved companion diagnostic test. Approval was primarily based on the FeDeriCa trial, a randomized, open-label, multicenter comparability study of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and hyaluronidase-zzxf subcutaneous injection compared with intravenous pertuzumab and intravenous trastuzumab administered in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings with chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with early breast cancer. The pharmacokinetic endpoints were, first, to demonstrate that the exposure of subcutaneous pertuzumab was not inferior to that of intravenous pertuzumab, and then to demonstrate that the exposure of subcutaneous trastuzumab was not inferior to that of intravenous trastuzumab. The primary endpoints were met with the observed lower limit of the two-sided 90% confidence intervals above the prespecified noninferiority margins. The most common adverse reactions were alopecia, nausea, diarrhea, anemia, and asthenia. The totality of the evidence demonstrated comparability of the subcutaneous product to intravenous, allowing for extrapolation and approval of all breast cancer indications for which intravenous trastuzumab and pertuzumab are approved.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Esquema de Medicação , Aprovação de Drogas , Feminino , Humanos , Hialuronoglucosaminidase/administração & dosagem , Hialuronoglucosaminidase/efeitos adversos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Trastuzumab/administração & dosagem , Trastuzumab/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
5.
Clin Cancer Res ; 23(23): 7165-7170, 2017 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28751443

RESUMO

On December 19, 2016, the FDA granted accelerated approval to rucaparib (RUBRACA; Clovis Oncology, Inc.) for the treatment of patients with deleterious BRCA mutation (germline and/or somatic)-associated advanced ovarian cancer who have been treated with two or more chemotherapies. The FDA also approved the FoundationFocus CDx BRCA test (Foundation Medicine, Inc.), the first next-generation sequencing-based companion diagnostic, for identifying patients with advanced ovarian cancer eligible for treatment with rucaparib based on detection of deleterious BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations in tumor tissue. Rucaparib's approval was based primarily on efficacy data from 106 patients with BRCA mutation-associated ovarian cancer who had prior treatment with two or more chemotherapies and safety data from 377 patients with ovarian cancer treated with rucaparib 600 mg orally twice daily on two open-label, single-arm trials. Investigator-assessed objective response rate was 54% [57/106; 95% confidence interval (CI), 44-64], and median duration of response was 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-11.7). The approved companion diagnostic verified tumor BRCA mutation status retrospectively in 96% (64/67) of patients. Common adverse reactions (≥20%) to rucaparib were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, anemia, abdominal pain, dysgeusia, constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, and dyspnea. This article summarizes the FDA review and data supporting rucaparib's accelerated approval. Clin Cancer Res; 23(23); 7165-70. ©2017 AACRSee related commentary by Kohn et al., p. 7155.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Mutação , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
7.
Clin Cancer Res ; 21(18): 4035-9, 2015 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26374073

RESUMO

On December 3, 2014, the FDA granted accelerated approval of blinatumomab (Blincyto; Amgen, Inc.) for treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-negative relapsed or refractory precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL). Blinatumomab is a recombinant murine protein that acts as a bispecific CD19-directed CD3 T-cell engager. The basis for the approval was a single-arm trial with 185 evaluable adults with R/R ALL. The complete remission (CR) rate was 32% [95% confidence interval (CI), 26%-40%], and the median duration of response was 6.7 months. A minimal residual disease response was achieved by 31% (95% CI, 25%-39%) of all patients. Cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events were serious toxicities that occurred. Other common (>20%) adverse reactions were pyrexia, headache, edema, febrile neutropenia, nausea, tremor, and rash. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated transaminases were the most common (>10%) laboratory abnormalities related to blinatumomab. A randomized trial is required in order to confirm clinical benefit.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Aprovação de Drogas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/química , Antígenos CD19/metabolismo , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/química , Complexo CD3/metabolismo , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Citocinas/metabolismo , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasia Residual , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/terapia , Recidiva , Indução de Remissão , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
8.
Clin Cancer Res ; 21(16): 3586-90, 2015 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26275952

RESUMO

On November 13, 2013, the FDA granted accelerated approval to ibrutinib (IMBRUVICA capsules; Pharmacyclics, Inc.) for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least one prior therapy. On February 12, 2014, the FDA granted accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received at least one prior therapy. Ibrutinib is a first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor that received all four expedited programs of the FDA: Fast-Track designation, Breakthrough Therapy designation, Priority Review, and Accelerated Approval. Both approvals were based on overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) in single-arm clinical trials in patients with prior treatment. In MCL (N = 111), the complete and partial response rates were 17.1% and 48.6%, respectively, for an ORR of 65.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 56.2%-74.5%]. The median DOR was 17.5 months (95% CI, 15.8-not reached). In CLL (N = 48), the ORR was 58.3% (95% CI, 43.2%-72.4%), and the DOR ranged from 5.6 to 24.2 months. The most common adverse reactions (≥ 30% in either trial) were thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, neutropenia, bruising, upper respiratory tract infection, anemia, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, peripheral edema, and nausea.


Assuntos
Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/tratamento farmacológico , Pirazóis/farmacocinética , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Idoso , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/patologia , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperidinas , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos
9.
Clin Cancer Res ; 21(19): 4257-61, 2015 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26187614

RESUMO

On December 19, 2014, the FDA approved olaparib capsules (Lynparza; AstraZeneca) for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) advanced ovarian cancer who have been treated with three or more prior lines of chemotherapy. The BRACAnalysis CDx (Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.) was approved concurrently. An international multicenter, single-arm trial enrolled 137 patients with measurable gBRCAm-associated ovarian cancer treated with three or more prior lines of chemotherapy. Patients received olaparib at a dose of 400 mg by mouth twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The objective response rate (ORR) was 34% with median response duration of 7.9 months in this cohort. The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients treated with olaparib were anemia, nausea, fatigue (including asthenia), vomiting, diarrhea, dysgeusia, dyspepsia, headache, decreased appetite, nasopharyngitis/pharyngitis/upper respiratory infection, cough, arthralgia/musculoskeletal pain, myalgia, back pain, dermatitis/rash, and abdominal pain/discomfort. Myelodysplatic syndrome and/or acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 2% of the patients enrolled on this trial.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Aprovação de Drogas , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Ftalazinas/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , United States Food and Drug Administration , Animais , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Ftalazinas/farmacologia , Piperazinas/farmacologia , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/farmacologia , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
11.
Clin Cancer Res ; 19(22): 6067-73, 2013 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24141628

RESUMO

This article summarizes the regulatory evaluation that led to the full approval of enzalutamide (XTANDI, Medivation Inc.) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on August 31, 2012, for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have previously received docetaxel. This approval was based on the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial which randomly allocated 1,199 patients with mCRPC who had received prior docetaxel to receive either enzalutamide, 160 mg orally once daily (n = 800), or placebo (n = 399). All patients were required to continue androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. At the prespecified interim analysis, a statistically significant improvement in overall survival was demonstrated for the enzalutamide arm compared with the placebo arm [HR = 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.75; P < 0.0001]. The median overall survival durations were 18.4 months and 13.6 months in the enzalutamide and placebo arms, respectively. The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) included asthenia or fatigue, back pain, diarrhea, arthralgia, hot flush, peripheral edema, musculoskeletal pain, headache, and upper respiratory infection. Seizures occurred in 0.9% of patients on enzalutamide compared with no patients on the placebo arm. Overall, the FDA's review and analyses of the submitted data confirmed that enzalutamide had a favorable benefit-risk profile in the study patient population, thus supporting its use for the approved indication. The recommended dose is 160 mg of enzalutamide administered orally once daily. Enzalutamide represents the third product that the FDA has approved in the same disease setting within a period of 2 years. Clin Cancer Res; 19(22); 6067-73. ©2013 AACR.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas , Feniltioidantoína/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Benzamidas , Docetaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Feniltioidantoína/efeitos adversos , Feniltioidantoína/uso terapêutico , Sobrevida , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
12.
FASEB J ; 22(11): 3878-87, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18676402

RESUMO

A significant unresolved question is how vitamin A deprivation causes, and why retinoic acid fails to reverse, immunodeficiency. When depleted of vitamin A, T cells undergo programmed cell death (PCD), which is enhanced by the natural competitor of retinol, anhydroretinol. PCD does not happen by apoptosis, despite the occurrence of shared early events, including mitochondrial membrane depolarization, permeability transition pore opening, and cytochrome c release. It also lacks caspase-3 activation, chromatin condensation, and endonuclease-mediated DNA degradation, hallmarks of apoptosis. PCD following vitamin A deprivation exhibits increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), drastic reductions in ATP and NAD(+) levels, and activation of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) -1. These latter steps are causative because neutralizing ROS, imposing hypoxic conditions, or inhibiting PARP-1 by genetic or pharmacologic approaches prevents energy depletion and PCD. The data highlight a novel regulatory role of vitamin A in mitochondrial energy homeostasis.


Assuntos
Metabolismo Energético , Mitocôndrias/metabolismo , Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/metabolismo , Deficiência de Vitamina A/enzimologia , Trifosfato de Adenosina/metabolismo , Animais , Apoptose , Hipóxia Celular , Fragmentação do DNA , Ativação Enzimática , Homeostase , Humanos , Células Jurkat , Camundongos , Camundongos Knockout , Mitocôndrias/patologia , NAD/metabolismo , Estresse Oxidativo , Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerase-1 , Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/genética , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo , Vitamina A/metabolismo , Deficiência de Vitamina A/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...